Greetings Khani.jaan.mikm5,
Enjoy More with a good score.
Having good credit is more important in today's economy than ever before.
Just a few points on your score can be the difference between getting a home loan,
auto loan, or even a credit card.
Visit here -> http://www.yodkif.com/score/repair.html
for your Credit Repair Evaluation Today, On Us!
We may be able to help boost your score by 300 points or more!
------------------------------------------------------------
To stop receiving messages, please visit here http://www.yodkif.com/olde/mfkd.dmvvdd or send a request to:
50 California Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, CA 94111
lesome actually, there is. Controllers are, by definition, tightly bound to their corresponding views, for their job is to interpret human gestures (key presses, mouse updates, etc) into events for individual controls on a window. This is why you have a strict one controller, one view relationship. Controllers were never intended for form-wide use. For form-wide use, Application Model (aka Presentation Model) came into existence, which better suits that purpose. Since non-Smalltalk GUIs don't rely on MVC to implement controls, MVC makes relatively little sense in practice. Samuel A. Falvo II Apr 5 at 15:31
Samuel please clarify what you're talking about. Unless you're telling me the history of the team that "invented" MVC then I'm incredibly dubious about your text. If you're just talking about WinForm then there are other ways of doing things and I've created WinForm projects where control bindings are managed by the controller, not "individual controls". Quibblesome Apr 7 at 12:44Good picture. I use MVP quite a lot, so I'd like to make one point. In my experience, the Presenters need to talk to one another quite often. Same is true for the Models (or Business objects). Because of these additional "blue lines" of communication that would be in your MVP pic, the Presenter-Model relationships can become quite entangled. Therefore, I tend to keep a one-to-one Presenter-Model relationship vs. a one-to-many. Yes, it requires some additional delegate methods on the Model, but it reduces many headaches if the API of the Model changes or needs refactoring. splungebob Feb 28 at 14:45
you're trying to imply that a static xml file is the view and an activity is a presenter/controller then you're missing the part of MVC/MVP pattern actually decouples the view and presenter. You cannot instantiate an activity without talking to your layout/view. Really what you want to do is use composition and embed the activity
The MVC example is wrong; there's a strict 1:1 relationship between views and controllers. By definition, a controller interprets human gesture input to produce events for the model and view alike for a single control. More simply, MVC was intended for use with individual widgets only. One widget, one view, one control. Samuel A. Falvo II Apr 5 at 15:34
No comments:
Post a Comment