Dear Khani.jaan.mikm5,
Highlights:
===========
- Homeowners can Refi up to 125 percent of their homes value
- Second home and Investment properties may be eligible
- As of 06/23 UPDATE: 2.99% Fixed rate is available to you -
We are contacting you today so you can take advantage of a new lower home rate.
2014 U.S. Rate Update - Housing Systems is allowing for lower monthly rates.
View Your Savings Below
-> http://www.stopfeatures.com/rate/update.index
It literally take 5 minutes or less to confirm your new monthly.
(Ref-ID--77441)
| Mortgage Refinance | Refi W/O | Home Improvement | Debt Consolidation | Equity Loan |
View Estimator -> http://www.stopfeatures.com/rate/update.index
to modify message settings- Current Update Alerts
1644 Doral Dr/Brookings/SD 57006 - http://www.stopfeatures.com/wkr4.ewr4j
: No. In this case all keys equal by value are dropped (difference between equals and comparion by reference). Additionally: Even this code has problems with the following sequence mapThe comparator used for the treemap is inconsistent with equals (see the sortMap javadox). This means retireving items from the tree map will not work. sorted_map.get("A") will return null. That means this use of treemap is broken. That is true only if the base map is altered. As long as it is not modified the natural order of the keys (according to the comparator) will follow the natural order of the values. Just in case it's not clear to people: this solution will probably not do what you want if you have multiple keys mapping to the same value -- only one of those keys will appear in the sorted result.It's practically a bug ... I can image a very few use cases for omitting one of 2 map entries that have the same
Louis Wasserman (yes, one of the Google Guava guys), actually dislikes this answer quite a bit: "It breaks in several really confusing ways if you even look at it funny. If the backing map changes, it will break. If multiple keys map to the same value, it will break. If you call get on a key that isn't in the backing map, it will break. If you do anything whatsoever that would cause a lookup to happen on a key that isn't in the map -- ValueComparator#compare() does not return 0 for equals (see edited answer) @Maxy-B 's comment about missing keys no longer applies Tomasz Sep 6 '12 at 17:14 mpty working folder to start with. Running this will remove everything from the index, true, they will remain on your working folder but your history, when committed, will be the equivalent of destroying everything and starting from scratch. the proper answer was indeed, quite simply git reset . If you do indeed follow instructions here and got really scared at t
I regret using this approach. Now I reproduced in my code all the bugs described here in comments. My mistake was not reading the comments.var sorted_map = map.OrderByDescending(entry => entry.Value); (in C#). Sorry, I Rhubarb's answer is the correct one. HEAD may not yet exist and it is to reset the HEAD file rather than unstage a file, which is what you asked about If you're on *nix, use 'git cola'; that way you can pick and choose specific lines in the source for commit (as opposed to adding commits by file). Evan Plaice Oct 31 '12 at 4:53
Starting with Git v1.8.4, all the answers below that use HEAD or head can now use @ in place of HEAD instead. See this answer (last section) to learn why you can do that. Damn, in Mercurial it is just hg revert in any case (with history or without previous history). I wish git was less unnecessarily complicated. dukeofgaming As read this post on 2013/12/16, the question has nearly 2k votes, there are 2 dozen answers with upvotes, meaning they were at least partly right if not 100% complete, 1 of which has nearly 2000 votes and another of which has over 1k votes. To me, this says volumes about git. The question is not clearly posed! If the file is already in the repository, and you added it to staging, the answer is git reset HEAD file (==> the file is still in the git repository). If the file was not there before and you don't want to add it use: git rm --cached file (==> the file will not be added to git) Michael_Scharf Jan 16 at 19:39
No comments:
Post a Comment