We share Oprah's journey

You probably think that it's too late to burn your extra Winter Weight you gained before you bust out your bikini and tank tops. THAT'S ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE.

No need to fear, you can drop 1LB a day with "The Doctors" method that worked for Oprah and everyone else who has tried.

Oprah's Secret: http://www.byerope.com/GMA-show/Oprahs-simple-secret-the-doctors-live

It Involves----
NO going to a grimy gym
NO Starvation or food restrictions

 

 

[Be On The Show | Episodes | Meet Us
EP Recap: http://www.byerope.com/GMA-show/Oprahs-simple-secret-the-doctors-live
------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recent Shows:
Summer Swimming Dangers; Salt Water Cleanses; Treating Swimmers Ear

<><><><><><><><><>

Mom Cheats Death during Childbirth; High-Tech Hair Regrowth; Pizza Therapy?

<><><><><><><><><>

Life-Saving Kidney Swaps; Overcoming Leukemia; Surgical Fix for Droopy Eyelids

<><><><><><><><><>
[[4 Tulip CT.,, Highland Mills,, NY]]
[[To forgo messages-please write or Go To This URL ]]
Thank You.

 

 

 

Should mothers who give birth to drug-addicted babies face jail time? The Doctors debate a controversial new law. Then, see how a social media snapshot helped detect a young girls dangerous eye disorder. Plus, from whole grains to fresh fruits, learn which healthy foods pack the biggest nutritional punch.

 

 

 

int main(void)
{
auto a=1;
return 0;
}
gets compiled without errors by the MS Visual Studio 2012 compiler, when the file has the .c extension. I have always thought that when you use the .c extension, compilation should be according to the C syntax, and not C++. Moreover, as far as I know auto without a type is allowed only in C++ since C++11, where it means that the type is deduced from the initializer.

Does that mean that my compiler isn't sticking to C, or is the code actually correct in C-language
auto is an old C keyword that means "local scope". auto a is the same as auto int a, and because local scope is the default for a variable declared inside a function, it's also the same as int a in this example.

This keyword is actually a leftover from C's predecessor B, where there were no base types: everything was int, pointer to int, array of int.(*) Declarations would be either auto or extrn [sic]. C inherited the "everything is int" as a default rule, so you could declare integers with

auto a;
extern b;
static c;
ISO C got rid of this, but many compilers still accept it for backward compatibility. If it seems unfamiliar, then you should realise that a related rule is at work in

unsigned d; // actually unsigned int
which is still common in modern code.

C++11 reused the keyword, which few if any C++ programmers were using with the original meaning, for its type inference. This is mostly safe because the "everything is int" rule from C had already been dropped in C++98; the only thing that breaks is auto T a, which no-one was using anyway. (Somewhere in his papers on the history of the language, Stroustrup comments on this, but I can't find the exact reference right now.)

(*) String handling in B was interesting: you'd use arrays of int and pack multiple characters in each member. B was actually BCPL with different syntax.